Guest on The Infra Blog: Matt Dellinger, Author, INTERSTATE 69: THE UNFINISHED HISTORY OF THE LAST GREAT AMERICAN HIGHWAY

Posted by Steve Anderson on Wednesday, September 15th, 2010

Matt Dellinger is a writer-journalist, photographer, and multimedia producer. He produced and hosted The New Yorker Out Loud, the magazine’s first weekly podcast. Before that he worked on The New Yorker staff for ten years as an illustrations editor, multimedia producer, and manager of editorial projects such as The Complete New Yorker digital archive and the launch (and relaunch) of Newyorker.com. Dellinger also coached The New Yorker‘s softball team for eight seasons. His writing has appeared in The New Yorker, the Atlantic, the Oxford American, Smithsonian, the Wall Street Journal magazine, and The New York Times. He has discussed transportation and planning issues as a frequent guest commentator on WNYC’s morning show The Takeaway. Dellinger was born in Indianapolis, Indiana, and graduated from DePauw University. He lives in Brooklyn, New York.

Matt Dellinger:

The proposed route of I-69

How I-69 began

Our funding mechanism is broken

We’re living off our grandparents’ investments

Download transcript (PDF): Matt Dellinger on The Infra Blog

dellinger-matt

Tags: , , , , , , ,

One Response to “Guest on The Infra Blog: Matt Dellinger, Author, INTERSTATE 69: THE UNFINISHED HISTORY OF THE LAST GREAT AMERICAN HIGHWAY”

  1. Bill Stremmel says:

    Massive extension of I-69 is highway overkill. The Interstate system is not primarily oriented east-west. A dog-leg southwesterly via I-70 from Indianapolis to I-57 in Illinois, thence south via I-57 and I-55 reaches Memphis without too many extra miles and none of the extraordinary environmental cost of building a new terrain highway. From Memphis Interstates 40-30-35 connect Little Rock, Dallas-Fort Worth, Austin, and San Antonio in a nearly geographically direct route to the Mexican border at Laredo. The State of Texas has already designated the I-35 corridor for upgrading to meet future freight volumes. A motoring trip from Austin to Dallas five years ago during the boom economy was done at 70+ mph and most other traffic was passing me.

    Some Hoosiers desperate for a short-term economic fix would grasp at any construction project; Many others do not want the permanent disruption to the sensitive ecology of the southwestern quadrant of their state entailed by this unworthy highway. Ditto for Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas.

    Marginal benefit versus marginal cost is a benchmark that needs to be applied to all infrastructure projects. Goods moving between Canada and Mexico should be on rail because that is much more energy efficient, cost-effective than trucks for movements exceeding several hundred miles. Steel-wheel-on-steel-rail is self-steering and inherently more efficient and less ecologically harmful than rubber tire on paved roadway. Chicago is getting unsnarled by the CREATE program and the Soo Line’s realignment of train movements around that city’s congested core. Addressing other bottlenecks on key rail routes would cost far less $ and entail none of environmental cost of a new highway.

    Immediate relief for truckers would be afforded by cajoling Illinois to raise the speed limit for trucks from 55 to 65 mph, and the limit for cars from 65 to 70 mph on its rural interstates. This matches the limits for all neighboring states, and is reasonable from a safety standpoint.

Follow InfraUSA on Twitter Facebook YouTube Flickr

CATEGORIES


Show us your infra! Show us your infra!

Video, stills and tales. Share images of the Infra in your community that demands attention. Post your ideas about national Infra issues. Go ahead. Show Us Your Infra!  Upload and instantly share your message.

Polls Polls

Is the administration moving fast enough on Infra issues? Are Americans prepared to pay more taxes for repairs? Should job creation be the guiding determination? Vote now!

Views

What do the experts think? This is where the nation's public policy organizations, trade associations and think tanks weigh in with analysis on Infra issues. Tell them what you think.  Ask questions.  Share a different view.

Blog

The Infra Blog offers cutting edge perspective on a broad spectrum of Infra topics. Frequent updates and provocative posts highlight hot button topics -- essential ingredients of a national Infra dialogue.


Dear Friends,

 

It is encouraging to finally see clear signs of federal action to support a comprehensive US infrastructure investment plan.

 

Now more than ever, our advocacy is needed to keep stakeholders informed and connected, and to hold politicians to their promises to finally fix our nation’s ailing infrastructure.

 

We have already engaged nearly 280,000 users, and hoping to add many more as interest continues to grow.

 

We require your support in order to rise to this occasion, to make the most of this opportunity. Please consider making a tax-deductible donation to InfrastructureUSA.org.

 

Steve Anderson

Managing Director

 

SteveAnderson@InfrastructureUSA.org

917-940-7125

InfrastructureUSA: Citizen Dialogue About Civil Infrastructure