Ten Years and $400 Billion in Federal Highway Spending Later, Are We Any Better Off?

Posted by Shane Phillips on Friday, May 16th, 2014
We’ve spent $365 billion on highways and added essentially zero new drivers since 2005. Shouldn’t traffic congestion be improving?


Demographic shifts and government investments seem poised to lead us to transportation nirvana… so why haven’t they?

The federal government has spent $365 billion out of the Highway Trust Fund’s highway account since 2005, pouring money into new roads, capacity improvements, and system preservation. At the same time, fewer people are driving, and those that are are doing it less: total annual vehicle-miles traveled haven’t budged for almost a decade even as we’ve added 20 million new residents, and per-capita VMT has fallen significantly. The number of cars on the road has remained essentially unchanged, cars per 1,000 residents peaked in 2007, and young people are doing just fine without a driver’s license, thank you.

More roads and fewer cars – that’s a recipe for improved mobility and reduced congestion if I’ve ever heard one.

How’s that working out for you?

Blowing hundreds of billions on roads hasn’t helped because more roads don’t reduce congestion in the long run. This isn’t progress, and it shouldn’t cost so much money just to tread water. If you want to reduce traffic congestion, institute a congestion charge. If you want to get people to their destinations faster, give buses dedicated lanes, build grade-separated high-capacity transit, and allow more housing next to job centers.

Imagine how much better our commutes would be if we’d spent that $400 billion on transit, bicycle, and pedestrian infrastructure that doesn’t have to contend with car-generated traffic congestion. Here’s to hoping we spend the next $400 billion more wisely, though I’m not holding my breath.

View original post (BetterInstitutions.com): Ten years and $400 Billion in Federal Highway Spending Later, Are We Any Better Off?

About Shane Phillips
“I grew up in the suburbs of Seattle, got my driver’s license the day I turned 16, and rarely visited the city because driving in it was so unpleasant. Seven years later I moved to Seattle and realized the problem wasn’t the city, but how I chose to get around in it. I’m currently pursuing my Masters in Public Administration and Urban Planning at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, and working on behalf of more sustainable, safe, healthy, economically productive cities.”

Tags: ,

Comments are closed.

Follow InfraUSA on Twitter Facebook YouTube Flickr


Show us your infra! Show us your infra!

Video, stills and tales. Share images of the Infra in your community that demands attention. Post your ideas about national Infra issues. Go ahead. Show Us Your Infra!  Upload and instantly share your message.

Polls Polls

Is the administration moving fast enough on Infra issues? Are Americans prepared to pay more taxes for repairs? Should job creation be the guiding determination? Vote now!


What do the experts think? This is where the nation's public policy organizations, trade associations and think tanks weigh in with analysis on Infra issues. Tell them what you think.  Ask questions.  Share a different view.


The Infra Blog offers cutting edge perspective on a broad spectrum of Infra topics. Frequent updates and provocative posts highlight hot button topics -- essential ingredients of a national Infra dialogue.