Insufficient Infrastructure Funding Impacts U.S. Mobility and Companies Such as UPS

Posted by Content Coordinator on Wednesday, January 8th, 2020

UPS Truck

AMERICANS FOR TRANSPORTATION MOBILITY COALITION (ATM)

Originally posted in FasterBetterSafer

Part Two of a Two-Part Series. Read Part One Here.

“If every UPS vehicle is five minutes late due to congestion per day, it costs the company $114 million annually,” says Tom Jensen, Vice President of Transportation Policy at UPS.

Whether it’s legislative or regulatory policy involving intermodal freight movements, fleet and surface transportation, maritime and rail issues, aviation measures or trucking matters, Jensen is a constant presence in D.C. He is also the Chair of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Transportation, Infrastructure and Logistics Committee (TILC).

The $114 million annual statistic has become a mantra and message-point for the company but when one drills down, the reality seems even heavier.

Transportation policy in the United States primarily happens in silos on the federal and Congressional levels, says Jensen, but our transportation infrastructure can and does not function this way. America has an integrated multimodal system and freight can come into or move through it in a span of ways and, like water, prefers the path of least resistance and will find alternatives when it bumps up against impediments.

There are numerous connections that need to happen that impact businesses like UPS. A drayage company, for example, generally moves containers short distances to and from warehouses, rail terminals and ocean ports, and they are partners who help get goods to the American consumer and labor and business, according to Jensen.

In the supply chain, businesses and infrastructure modes encounter or have inherent congested pathways today — yet interstates may be burdened with the ubiquitous bottlenecks with which the public is most familiar. Each year the American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI) releases a list that focuses on the most congested truck bottlenecks in the country and the media reacts.

Most leading companies, such as UPS, have information technology (IT) and logistical systems that are multitudinous, integrated and fluid, but also predictable.

By design, the majority of UPS’s tractor-trailer drivers, known as feeder drivers, are “out and back” in the same day, and do not drive “over the road” for multiple days and nights. The company’s network systems function to reduce the time that goods are in transit, as the volume of goods the company delivers has risen and customer expectations of faster delivery times has increased.

Generally, drivers arrive at work at a certain time and have set routes, and go home typically after a nine- or 10-hour shift, according to Mike Marshall, Transportation Manager for the company’s Minnesota & Wisconsin territory. The majority of UPS feeder drivers will travel a few hundred miles to predetermined meet points. One driver might take a trailer out of Minneapolis and drive to Des Moines, Iowa, while another driver leaves Lenexa, Kansas, to head toward Des Moines so they can swap trailers and then each head back. Conversely, there are also a smaller number of drivers who spend a majority of their day making customer pickups, and might travel 50 to 100 miles a day.

Marshall explains how overburdened infrastructure can affect his operations: A trailer might leave the Oak Creek, Milwaukee, location and is scheduled to arrive in Chicago, at another facility, at 3 a.m. — however, congestion making a driver merely 15 minutes late can have ricocheting impacts. It can affect the trailer making service, which could mean not processing thousands of packages for customers at the scheduled time.

UPS, which is a member of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, receives numerous recognitions, has a strong corporate identity, is a profitable parcel mover, and has a commitment to positioning itself for tomorrow’s world.

Forbes, in a partnership with Just Capital, named UPS among “The 2020 Just 100,” which examined how publicly held businesses perform on matters of corporate justness. The 112-year-old company was also chosen by consumers “Among the Top 5 Most Loved Brands in America.” The Morning Consult ranking was based on survey interviews that measured consumer sentiment in areas like trust, community impact, and Net Promoter Score.

But this alone isn’t going to get Tommy his train set during the holidays.

Jensen wants people to really grasp what’s at stake. In Northern New Jersey and in the New York metropolitan region, he said that today, versus just eight years ago, UPS daily dispatches 60 additional package cars because of growing congestion and because the majority of packages are time-guaranteed.

Additionally, he said to meet deadlines, UPS must dispatch 20 more tractor-trailers in that area to accommodate different loads and different configurations. He emphasizes that these scenarios just add to gridlock and that there are bottlenecks, what UPS refers to as pinch-points, throughout the nation. Among them are New Jersey and metropolitan New York, Atlanta, Houston, the Los Angeles basin, and the Chicago area where rail and highways intersect.

“Goods don’t stop at state borders,” offers Jensen. “Transportation networks don’t stay wholly within or move intrastate and you look at the United States Constitution and see that the role of interstate commerce is very clear. … And we need a strong federal program to support that goods movement. Any kinds of impediment that prevent goods moving from one state to another are problematic from an economic perspective and from an operational perspective and, again, large companies that work in the goods movement industry realize that we need a strong federal program.”

According to Jensen, many members of Congress and elected officials support a strong federal infrastructure program. But he adds that “some think we should take this and devolve it back to the states and let the states have the lead role and responsibility. And to their credit, some states have done some interesting, unique and creative policy changes in recent years, but the reason the states have done all of this creativity and the out-of-the-box thinking and programs is because of the federal government’s paralysis in this area.”

Declining infrastructure is a national issue that cannot be easily truncated, despite the dysfunction in the nation’s capital. “Our transportation system is a necessity, not a luxury, for every American,” says Americans for Transportation Mobility (ATM) Coalition Executive Director Ed Mortimer. “Not addressing how we sustainably fund it, modernize it, prepare for tomorrow, and make it the world’s best is shortsighted and, quite frankly, very risky. No policymaker should want this to happen on his or her watch.”

Mortimer also says that transportation infrastructure proponents emphasize the need to use innovation and technology to modernize infrastructure.

Jensen shares that an intermodal movement from a port to rail regularly being slowed down, final-mile deliveries being tardy, a small business or a consumer at home consistently receiving a “widget” or item later than planned can all affect American businesses and commerce because too many redundancies or inefficiencies raise operating costs.

“We do need a strong federal program — it’s critical — and we continue to support that and our large customers understand that as well. We’re hoping as we move forward that the Congress and the current Administration will stick to that point and move forward on having the lead role on transportation policy being led by the federal government,” says Jensen.

As Jensen works in the nation’s gritty advocacy and lobbying world, and Marshall deals with drivers hundreds of miles away, UPS moves on. In essence, the company is one of countless corporations left holding the bag of American infrastructure policies and funding that leaders provide our communities and spheres of commerce.

“The fundamental funding mechanism for surface-transportation investment and infrastructure in our country is structurally broken — how we fund the Highway Trust Fund, and how we pay into the Highway Trust Fund — and we are in this current deficit mode where we take in billions of dollars less than we spend, or that we need to spend annually, just to keep our roads up to a state of good repair, let alone to invest [for the future] and as our economy grows, the infrastructure deficit problem exacerbates and gets worse,” observes Jensen. “Everyone is in favor of economic growth. We all know that, and everybody on Capitol Hill — Democrats, Republicans and everyone in between — is in favor of economic growth, but we need to figure out a new and better way of how we fund and structure our infrastructure investment for the benefit of safety, the private sector, and the benefits of mobility and quality of life [for the public] as well.”

Sign the petition to tell our leaders to rebuild America here: https://action.uschamber.com/yYv5aKO

View original post on FasterBetterSafer

About the Americans for Transportation Mobility Coalition (ATM)
www.fasterbettersafer.org
The Americans for Transportation Mobility (ATM) Coalition formed in 2001. It brings together businesses, the labor and union sectors, transportation stakeholders, and the public to advocate a robust transportation infrastructure grid in the United States. This includes promoting ongoing and sustainable funding through policies and broad-based initiatives.

Tags: , , , ,

Comments are closed.

Follow InfraUSA on Twitter Facebook YouTube Flickr

CATEGORIES


Show us your infra! Show us your infra!

Video, stills and tales. Share images of the Infra in your community that demands attention. Post your ideas about national Infra issues. Go ahead. Show Us Your Infra!  Upload and instantly share your message.

Polls Polls

Is the administration moving fast enough on Infra issues? Are Americans prepared to pay more taxes for repairs? Should job creation be the guiding determination? Vote now!

Views

What do the experts think? This is where the nation's public policy organizations, trade associations and think tanks weigh in with analysis on Infra issues. Tell them what you think.  Ask questions.  Share a different view.

Blog

The Infra Blog offers cutting edge perspective on a broad spectrum of Infra topics. Frequent updates and provocative posts highlight hot button topics -- essential ingredients of a national Infra dialogue.


Dear Friends,

 

It is encouraging to finally see clear signs of federal action to support a comprehensive US infrastructure investment plan.

 

Now more than ever, our advocacy is needed to keep stakeholders informed and connected, and to hold politicians to their promises to finally fix our nation’s ailing infrastructure.

 

We have already engaged nearly 280,000 users, and hoping to add many more as interest continues to grow.

 

We require your support in order to rise to this occasion, to make the most of this opportunity. Please consider making a tax-deductible donation to InfrastructureUSA.org.

 

Steve Anderson

Managing Director

 

SteveAnderson@InfrastructureUSA.org

917-940-7125

InfrastructureUSA: Citizen Dialogue About Civil Infrastructure