Support for
has been provided by these organizations and individuals:

John Hennessy III,

Moving Forward: Bringing Communication-Based Train Control to NYC Subways

Posted by Content Coordinator on Thursday, May 8th, 2014


movingforward-thumbThe New York City subway system has made strides in recent years in upgrading stations, subway cars and passengers’ experience. But in one crucial area – signaling – the subway system remains antiquated, relying primarily on century-old technology to keep trains running. While New York is in the early stages of converting to communications-based train control, the modern telecommunications system that many of the world’s metro systems rely on today, the pace of change has been slow. At the current rate, a full transformation wouldn’t occur for more than 50 years, putting the city decades behind its peers around the globe.

What are the consequences of going too slowly?
More delays, increased safety risk and an inefficient use of resources. Because the network relies on old technology, repairs and replacement parts are costly. As the system ages, that burden will only increase.

What is holding New York back? 
Resources, certainly. While CBTC will save money in the long run, it requires a substantial upfront investment in new systems and equipment. Future capital plans need to significantly increase funding beyond current levels. Converting to CBTC also could be done sooner with modifications to procurement rules and more flexibility to work on the tracks throughout the day. These are hard decisions that involve changes to longstanding procedures, but could speed up other projects in addition to signal work.

This report will explain what CBTC is and how it works. It will discuss the status of CBTC in New York City’s subway system, and make recommendations to implement it more quickly and efficiently.

What is Communications-Based Train Control?
Today, the New York City subway relies on a central nervous system made up of 15,000 signal blocks, 3,500 mainline switches and 339,000 signal relays. These components, which have hardly changed since the subway opened in 1904, let train operators know when it is safe for them to move trains forward.

The type of signaling system used by New York’s subway, called fixed-block wayside signals, divides the subway tracks into blocks of around 1,000 feet and creates a buffer of one or more additional trailing blocks to ensure safe separation of train traffic. The buffers limit the number of trains that can flow through the tracks at any one time.

The effects of these constraints have increased as subway ridership has grown. In the last 20 years, the number of passengers has climbed to its highest level since 1950, with more  growth expected in the coming years. During peak periods, trains are forced to wait in stations while crowds of passengers exit and enter the cars, causing delays that ricochet through the system. The result is fewer trains running per hour. In off-peak hours, where ridership growth has been greater, it has become increasingly difficult to find adequate time to inspect, maintain and replace the signal blocks, switches, relays and automatic train stops without major effects on service. Dispatchers can only determine so much now about train location, and lack the precision and ability to centrally monitor and manage the entire system.

By contrast, CBTC combines the firepower of higher-speed computers and fiber-optic data communications to link tracks and vehicles into a seamless system. Computerized signal equipment installed along the tracks and on subway trains establishes precise knowledge about the location and speed of each vehicle, making it possible to centrally monitor and respond rapidly as conditions change.

Benefits for riders, operators, businesses and the public

The benefits of CBTC flow from the greater efficiency, reliability and flexibility that it provides. Because trains can safely run closer together, they can circulate with greater frequency, reducing bunching and uneven service. Theoretically, CBTC can accommodate 40 or more trains an hour, compared with at most 30 using traditional signal systems. Although running at full CBTC capacity would require other improvements to the subway network, such as straightening curved track and expanding stations, passengers would see substantially less waiting and crowding with CBTC.

Instantaneous communications would improve reliability, allowing New York City Transit to work around and respond quickly to both rare and commonplace events such as stalled trains, accidents, flooding and police actions. Customers also would experience more accurate and timely countdown clocks and other important information. While the upfront capital costs are high, the annual savings from reduced energy, maintenance and operations would substantially reduce the costs of running the system. Energy would be saved by smoothing rates of acceleration and deceleration, which also would make for a more comfortable ride. Since signal maintenance would be much less labor-intensive, the MTA would be able to maintain CBTC for far less than the $106 million annual cost for the current signal system. Trains could be operated with a crew of one instead of two, or even without a driver. That would allow the MTA to reduce overall costs, shift labor to other operational or service needs or implement a combination of cost reductions and service improvements.

The benefits from full implementation of CBTC will flow well beyond those who ride the subways. A more cost-effective transit system will reduce pressure on the three main sources of MTA revenue—fares, bridge and tunnel tolls and taxes from both residents and businesses. It won’t eliminate the need for additional revenue to maintain and expand the transit network, but it should be an essential part of a long-term financing strategy that includes both revenue increases and cost savings. Service improvements will allow the subways to comfortably absorb additional riders to support a growing economy for New York City and its suburbs. Without these improvements, New York will become less competitive with cities around the world that have more modern systems.



Download full version (PDF): Moving Forward 

About Regional Plan Association
Regional Plan Association improves the New York metropolitan region’s economic health, environmental sustainability and quality of life through research, planning and advocacy.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments are closed.

Follow InfraUSA on Twitter Facebook YouTube Flickr


Show us your infra! Show us your infra!

Video, stills and tales. Share images of the Infra in your community that demands attention. Post your ideas about national Infra issues. Go ahead. Show Us Your Infra!  Upload and instantly share your message.

Polls Polls

Is the administration moving fast enough on Infra issues? Are Americans prepared to pay more taxes for repairs? Should job creation be the guiding determination? Vote now!


What do the experts think? This is where the nation's public policy organizations, trade associations and think tanks weigh in with analysis on Infra issues. Tell them what you think.  Ask questions.  Share a different view.


The Infra Blog offers cutting edge perspective on a broad spectrum of Infra topics. Frequent updates and provocative posts highlight hot button topics -- essential ingredients of a national Infra dialogue.