Support for
has been provided by these organizations and individuals:

John Hennessy III,

Disparities in Park Quality and Pedestrian Streetscape Environments

Posted by Content Coordinator on Wednesday, August 24th, 2016


Two new studies shed light on how to make neighborhoods more   physical activity‐friendly for all people, regardless of income or race

Key findings:

  • Sometimes parks and streetscapes were higher quality in low‐income or high‐minority areas
  • Patterns of disparities varied by region, so local data are needed


Low‐income and minority populations suffer disproportionately high rates of chronic disease. Accordingly, national and international authorities have made the elimination of health disparities a priority.    Many factors can contribute to health disparities, including disparities in the quality of neighborhood environments.    For example, having a neighborhood park and pedestrian‐friendly streets may impact opportunities to engage in physical activity – a behavior that can reduce risk of chronic disease.

Research on how neighborhood environments relate to physical activity has typically focused on overall community design, like the number of intersections or distance to the nearest park. Most studies have not evaluated community features in greater detail, like whether parks had physical activity facilities, or if intersections had safe, marked crosswalks.   To address this research gap and improve our understanding of health disparities, two recent publications examined whether park quality and pedestrian streetscapes varied based on neighborhood income or racial/ethnic composition. As compared to changing overall community design, such as the layout of roads, improving the quality of parks and pedestrian streetscapes may provide a more feasible and affordable approach to creating activity‐friendly environments.

Both studies found evidence of disparities, where physical activity environments were less favorable in low‐income and high‐minority neighborhoods.    Surprisingly, both studies also found evidence of “equitable differences” – instances where park quality and streetscape features were better in low‐income and high‐ minority neighborhoods.    The results of these studies provide important information for local policy makers, planners, and community groups interested in making targeted changes to increase physical activity opportunities for all residents.

Conclusions & Recommendations

  • Park and streetscape features are changeable and offer a feasible and affordable approach to creating activity‐friendly environments.
  • Both studies found evidence of “disparities” (pedestrian features that were worse in low‐ income and/or high‐minority neighborhoods) and “equitable differences” (pedestrian features that were worse in high‐income and/or mostly White neighborhoods).
  • The park and streetscape features that exhibited disparities varied greatly between regions.
  • The different patterns found across regions suggest that local policies, practices, and funding priorities can be effective. Disparities in physical activity environments are not inevitable. They are due to local decision-making.
  • Given the differences found between regions, local audits are recommended to evaluate differences between neighborhoods and determine how to best allocate resources.
  • Information from audits can help local policy makers, planners, and community groups to identify disparities, make targeted changes, and increase physical activity opportunities for all residents, regardless of race, ethnicity, or income.
  • Community groups are encouraged to work with government agencies to document quality of physical activity environments in their neighborhoods and use local data to develop plans for improvement.

Disparities in Park Quality, Disparities in Pedestrian Streetscapes

Download full version (PDF): Disparities in Park Quality and Pedestrian Streetscape Environments

About Active Living Research
Since 2001, ALR has been at the forefront of building evidence on how to create communities that increase opportunities for physical activity. We have learned that communities designed for activity are better for health, economic vitality, and environmental sustainability.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments are closed.

Follow InfraUSA on Twitter Facebook YouTube Flickr


Show us your infra! Show us your infra!

Video, stills and tales. Share images of the Infra in your community that demands attention. Post your ideas about national Infra issues. Go ahead. Show Us Your Infra!  Upload and instantly share your message.

Polls Polls

Is the administration moving fast enough on Infra issues? Are Americans prepared to pay more taxes for repairs? Should job creation be the guiding determination? Vote now!


What do the experts think? This is where the nation's public policy organizations, trade associations and think tanks weigh in with analysis on Infra issues. Tell them what you think.  Ask questions.  Share a different view.


The Infra Blog offers cutting edge perspective on a broad spectrum of Infra topics. Frequent updates and provocative posts highlight hot button topics -- essential ingredients of a national Infra dialogue.