Support for
has been provided by these organizations and individuals:

John Hennessy III,

22nd Annual Highway Report: The Performance of State Highway Systems

Posted by Content Coordinator on Tuesday, September 27th, 2016


By David T. Hartgen, Ph.D., P.E. and M. Gregory Fields, Ph.D. Project Director: Baruch Feigenbaum

Executive Summary

Reason Foundation’s 22nd Annual Highway Report tracks the performance of the 50 state-owned highway systems. States are ranked in 11 categories including Interstate and rural primary road pavement conditions, deficient bridges, traffic congestion, fatality rates, unsafe narrow rural arterial lanes, capital costs per mile, administrative costs per mile, maintenance costs per mile and total highway expenditures per mile.

The study is based on spending and performance data that state highway agencies provided to the federal government for 2013, with the exception of traffic congestion data. The Federal Highway Administration is no longer publishing the traffic congestion data used in previous editions of the Annual Highway Report. As a result, this edition utilizes 2014 traffic congestion data from the Texas A&M Transportation Institute.

Although individual highway sections (roads, bridges, pavements) steadily deteriorate over time due to age, use, traffic and weather, they are also periodically improved by maintenance and reconstruction. As a result, system performance can improve even as individual roads and bridges deteriorate. Table ES1 summarizes recent system trends for key indicators at the national level. While bridge conditions and fatality rates continued to improve, the overall condition of the U.S. state-owned highway system worsened slightly from 2012 to 2013.

From 2012 to 2013, total revenues for state-administered highways increased almost 5%. However, nationally, expenditures for capital and bridges, maintenance and administration all dropped, possibly as states reduced outlays while waiting for federal action on a long-term transportation bill. The passage of the five-year federal transportation Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act passed and signed in 2015, may have added long-term certainty and additional funding to transportation. However, there is no guarantee that states will spend the additional money wisely in the coming years.

Having said that, the report shows that many individual states continued to make steady progress, and that declines in performance seem to be concentrated in just a few states.

Figure ES1: Trends in U.S. State Highway Performance, 1998–2013* Table ES1: Tracking the Performance of State-Owned Highways

South Carolina is atop the Annual Highway Report’s overall cost-effectiveness ratings for the first time since 1995. South Carolina has been a consistent top performer, ranking in the top 10 since 2003.

South Dakota, Kansas, Nebraska and Maine round out the top five in the overall rankings.

While smaller, more-rural states make up the top five, several large urban states (Ohio—9th, Missouri—12th, North Carolina—15th, and Texas—19th) are ranked in the top 20 overall.

At the bottom of the overall rankings are Alaska, New Jersey, Hawaii, Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

While most states deliver a high-quality road network cost effectively, several states have major state highway system performance problems:

  • Half (50%) of the nation’s rural Interstate mileage in poor condition can be found in just five states: Alaska, California, Colorado, Washington and Indiana.
  • Almost half (48%) of the country’s urban Interstate mileage rated in poor condition is in five states: California, New York, Texas, Michigan and Louisiana.
  • Over half (54%) of the rural primary mileage in poor condition is in five states: Alaska, Iowa, Minnesota, Texas and Wisconsin.
  • Traffic congestion in eight states (New Jersey, New York, California, Virginia, Maryland, Massachusetts, Illinois and Washington) causes over 50 hours of delay annually per auto commuter.
  • Although bridge conditions are steadily improving, six states (Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Hawaii) report more than one-third of their bridges as deficient.
  • Fatality rates continue to improve, but four states (South Carolina, Mississippi, West Virginia and Montana) have fatality rates greater than 1.5 per 100 million vehicle-miles.
  • Four states (West Virginia, Virginia, Pennsylvania and Vermont) report that more than one-third of their rural principal arterial roads have narrow lanes that may be unsafe for today’s vehicles.

A widening performance gap seems to be emerging between most states that are making progress and a few states that are finding it difficult to improve. There is also increasing evidence that higher-level road systems (Interstates, other freeways and principal arterials) are in better shape than lower-level road systems, particularly local roads.

Download full version (PDF): 22nd Annual Highway Report

About Reason Foundation
Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, applying and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists and opinion leaders

Tags: , , ,

Comments are closed.

Follow InfraUSA on Twitter Facebook YouTube Flickr


Show us your infra! Show us your infra!

Video, stills and tales. Share images of the Infra in your community that demands attention. Post your ideas about national Infra issues. Go ahead. Show Us Your Infra!  Upload and instantly share your message.

Polls Polls

Is the administration moving fast enough on Infra issues? Are Americans prepared to pay more taxes for repairs? Should job creation be the guiding determination? Vote now!


What do the experts think? This is where the nation's public policy organizations, trade associations and think tanks weigh in with analysis on Infra issues. Tell them what you think.  Ask questions.  Share a different view.


The Infra Blog offers cutting edge perspective on a broad spectrum of Infra topics. Frequent updates and provocative posts highlight hot button topics -- essential ingredients of a national Infra dialogue.